Afterthought on “Elite”

René Guénon, De l’initiation:

Never has talk of “the elite” been so incessant, so omnipresent, as now that the elite no longer exists. One even hears talk about “elites”, meaning roughly individuals who surpass, even ever so slightly, the ‘mean’, however low this may be, in any sort of activity whatsoever. (Some sports-journalists speak of “athletic elites” — the final degree of degeneration one can inflict on this word!)

What, then, is the proper sense of elite? The etymological sense is elected, but this, insists Guénon, must be understood neither in the mundane sense of selection for an office nor in the spiritual but exoteric sense of beatitude (the selection of “the elect” by God for salvation), but only in the sense of those who possess all of the qualifications for an initiation into the mysteries which lead to the full development of human possibilities, to an awareness of the unity of these possibilities in one self, and ultimately to a deeper primordial consciousness of what is beyond man.

Well!

As I said in The Strange Topology of Populisms, I am guilty of shifting semantic gears between “the elite as de facto power brokers” and “the elite as ruling class forged by its function and its ethos” just as often as anyone else. But it’s always useful to remember that no matter how exacting your choice of words becomes, there will always be someone (I’m looking at you, Guénon!) who still won’t be satisfied.

 

 

[But Guénon does raise a good point about the “solecism” of referring to an elite (the group) as composed of many elites (the individuals). Teased apart from its esoteric premises, his point is that if a group of individuals is elected with respect to capabilities which fit them to serve the telos of their institution, then no member of the elite is qualified unless all are. No one of them could be “an elite” by himself. Morphology aside, this point about the formal interdependence of function and matter in an elite is worth remembering. — And practically speaking, if there is going to be a plural form of elite, we would do well to reserve this for multiple (potentially rival) groups, an area where the distinction in number is important but easily obscured. Are Western capitalist countries led by one globalist elite, or by various national elites? And within each civilization/nation, is there a single unified ruling elite, or a competition between various elites (the corporate elite, the academic elite, the military elite)?]

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Afterthought on “Elite”

  1. “I am guilty of shifting semantic gears between “the elite as de facto power brokers” and “the elite as ruling class forged by its function and its ethos” just as often as anyone else.”

    i’d stick with the first one, if anything, because the second one gives the hubristic impression that someone, somewhere is *picking the elites*, rather than elites *demonstrating* their superiority through actual performance. there is no elite which is not already in power. there are plenty wannabes, though.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I agree with you entirely on the impression elite-v2 creates but I think that’s the sort of bullet one just has to step out in front of, from a rhetorical point of view. I didn’t get involved in dissident politics to raise my social status. Sounding foolish only stings the first 50-100 times, and then it’s all downhill from there.

      (Seriously, while I am 100% d’accord on the need for an elite to demonstrate its own superiority, elite-v1 creates the impression every society must have an elite-v2, namely whoever happens to be in charge at time *t*. The purpose of sticking to elite-v2 isn’t to say “Hey no fair, I want my friend Jack to be Grand Poobah, he’s more elite than you!”, it’s to observe that the power-brokers in some societies lack the defining features of e-v2, and their societies lack the functions that e-v2 would perform. — Btw, have you read the “Forging of a reactionary ethos” piece I linked to? That might be a good place to start sifting through disagreements. Provisionally I’m willing to say Christensen speaks for something close to what I would call elite-v2.)

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s